Thursday, 10 December 2020

J&K Municipal Corporation Act, 2000

J&K Municipal Corporation Act, 2000: An Analysis of following Provisions.
1. Functions of Corporation  
2. Building Regulations         
3. Building Procedures, Powers and Penalties. 
4. Appointment and functions of Commissioner.
 
1. Functions of the ‘Municipal Corporation’

A municipal corporation/committee can be defined as an autonomous, or a self-government institution constituted for the purposes of regulation of local affairs, either in cities or in towns. In J&K, there are two Municipal Corporations (one each in Jammu & Srinagar). And as many as 20 Municipal Committees (one each in every district). Both Corporations and Committees have been constituted under Section 3 of the Municipal Corporation Act, 2000, and have been assigned a number of functions, which can be categorized into the following—
a.      General Functions/Powers. (Section 41)
b.      Obligatory functions. (Section 43)
c.       Functions entrusted by Governments. (Section 42), and
d.      Discretionary functions of the Corporation. (Section 44)
 
a.  a. General Powers/Functions.
According to Section 41 of the MCA, 2000— a municipal area is entrusted to the Corporation, or a Committee, which has been constituted for it. In other words, it means, every Corporation/Committee is responsible to manage to the local area, which comes under it. For instance, ‘Srinagar’ is under Srinagar Municipal Corporation; ‘Kulgam’ is under Kulgam Municipal Committee and similarly every District/city falls under its respective Committee/Corporation[1]. These bodies are duty-bound to take decisions and pass the resolutions, in relation to the financial, as well as other important matters.[2]

Obligatory functions are the functions, which are compulsory, binding, or incumbent in the convention. These functions, as a matter of obligation, are necessary to be discharged by Committees/Corporations. In case of failure, a corporation can be held responsible. Section 43 of the Act deals with such functions. It imposes a number of ‘obligations’ on the Corporation to fulfil its role. In this regard, the corporation/committee may take suitable measures to— 
1.   Construct and maintain the drainage system, including public toilets and other similar facilities. Apart from this the body is also responsible for the construction, maintenance and providing of water supply in its vicinity.
1.   Construct and maintain the drainage system, including public toilets and other similar facilities. Apart from this the body is also responsible for the construction, maintenance and providing of water supply in its vicinity.

2.      Keep its localities healthy, and remove filthy, rubbish or other obnoxious material, which may cause pollution or annoyance. In this regard, measures can be taken to prevent the spread of diseases.
3.      Construct and maintain the cattle pounding.

4.      Regulate and maintain the dedicated sites, which are meant for the burial/disposal of the dead bodies.
5.      Construct, maintain and regulate the Municipal Markets, in a way to prevent the dangerous, as well as offensive trade practices.

6.      Build, maintain and regularly improve the roads, bridges, paths, and etcetera. Apart from this, the corporation has to assure that there’s no obstruction on such places, which might cause inconvenience to the public in general. Streets and other premises need to be ‘named and numbered’. Moreover, they also have to maintain the municipal offices, and secure such sites, which may be dangerous to access.
7.      Regulate, and upkeep the recreational places, e.g., public parks, gardens etc.

8.      Preserve, protect and develop the ‘monuments, memorials and other valuable properties, which have been entrusted to their management. For this purpose, the committee has to ensure the survey of the buildings, and lands falling within its area.

9.      Implant trees for ‘roadside greenery’, and fulfil such obligations, which may be entrusted to their management from time to time.

 c.       Functions entrusted by Governments.
As already stated in Section 41 of the Act, a municipal corporation/committee is ‘wholly and solely’ responsible for the management of the affairs of a particular locality. Section 42(1), however, authorizes the Government to entrust the corporation with the powers, which they deem necessary for its ‘local self-governance. The expression ‘entrust’ means ‘to confer trust’, or ‘to deliver something in trust’. Hence, whatever functions are ‘notified to the corporation’, must be delivered efficiently, and without any compromise. The committee may be asked to—

1.      Prepare and present an extensive plan in relation to the economic development, and social justice.
2.      Carryout their functions actively, and ensure the implementation of different schemes in relation to…
a.       The regulation of ‘use of land’, ‘construction of buildings, roads, and bridges’.
b.      The ‘economic and social development’ of locale.
c.       The ‘supply of water (industrial and domestic)’, ‘public health’, ‘sanitation or ‘solid waste management’, and ‘up gradation’ as well as ‘improvement of slums’.
d.      The preservation, protection, and promotion of environment including ‘ecological aspects of environment’ including ‘urban forestry’.
e.       The ‘alleviation of poor in urban areas’ including the ‘interests of weaker sections, handicapped and mentally retarded’.
f.       The dedicated sites, e.g., ‘burial grounds/sites, cremation grounds (centres)’, and ‘urban amenities’ like public parks, gardens or play-grounds, and ‘street lighting’, ‘bus stops’, ‘public conveniences’ etcetera.
g.      The ‘cattle pounding’, ‘slaughter houses’, ‘tanneries’, and ‘prevention of cruelty to animals’.
h.      The ‘registration of births, deaths, and other important statistics’.
 According to a proviso added to Section 42(1), the government had to issue a notification in relation to the above matters within three months of the implementation of the Municipal Corporation Act, 2000. The said enactment has already come into force in the year 2000. Subsequently, per clause (2) of this section, once powers/functions have been vested to the corporation— it shall not be interpreted as to take away the other functions, given under different laws.
d.      Discretionary functions.
The expression ‘discretionary’ may be defined as ‘a state of having or using the ability to act or decide according to one’s own will, discretion or judgement’.
In other words, it means that the functions given under Section 44 are arbitrary in nature. In case corporation fails to accompli in discharge of its functions, it cannot be deemed to be in fault. Besides, these functions are generally falling under the ambit of other departments, but owing to their vitality corporation can take a due care at times. Following are the matters, in which corporation may exercise its discretion—
1.      It may work for the development of education in general, and for ‘cultural and physical’ education in particular. In order to achieve this goal, it may establish and maintain aid— to develop libraries, museums, or art galleries, botanical gardens, and zoological collections.
2.      Similarly, it may set an aid, and maintain it to regulate different stadiums, gymnasia, akharas (traditional wrestling clubs) and other places of such importance like— swimming pools, bathing places, and public washhouses.
3.      It may build up facilities for civic reception for the persons of higher distinction. Apart from this, it can also provide for the establishment of different theatres/cinemas in public places, or resorts, fairs and exhibitions.
4.      The corporation may also work for the construction and maintenance of rest houses and shelter homes for the poor and destitute. Or, houses for vulnerable groups like— children, deaf and dumb, handicapped and disabled, or mental asylums. The corporation may arrange the housing for inhabitants of any area, including its own.
5.      It has a discretion/power to work for the welfare and betterment of its officers, and employees. In relation to that— dwelling houses may be constructed, and maintained; including the sanctioning of loans, and purchase of vehicles.
6.      Corporation may go on organising the management of different bacteriological/chemical laboratories for the purposes of examining foods, drugs and water. Subsequently, it may also make different kinds of provisions for the relief of destitute, or disabled persons.
7.      It may also undertake the task of vaccination and inoculation for the purposes of public health. The establishment of hospitals; dispensaries and other welfare, including maternity wards for public medical relief.
8.      It has a power to organize, and manage different dairies, farms both in and outside the jurisdiction for the supply and procession of milk etcetera. It can construct, and maintain the cottage industries, handicrafts, sales emporium, or warehouses go-downs, sheds, garages, stables as well as vehicle stands.
9.      It may create provisions for filtered water supply, development of the municipal area, and approve schemes for that.
10.  It can undertake other such measures too which aren’t mentioned here, but are necessary for the convenience of the public, and are related to public safety, health or welfare.
2.      Building Regulation
2.      Building Regulation
Chapter fourteenth of the MCA, 2000 deals with the building regulations. It consists of Section 242-260 provisions—
242. Prohibition of erection of building without sanction.
It lays down an explicit law by prohibiting the construction and erection of any building, including the works given in Section 244. However, as per the exception given within this rule, a person having a proper sanction of the Commissioner under the law of land may be allowed to execute or erect any building or construction work.
243. Erection of building.
Per provisions of this Section, if a person wants to construct a house or building, he must get a sanction first. In order to get that sanction, he needs to file an application and fulfil the form to provide the required information. Apart from this, he has to submit the documents— which carry the plan and other specifications signed by a qualified civil engineer.
 244: Application for making repairs and additions of the building.
Every person who wants to execute the work related to the following matters has to file an application before the Municipal Corporation to get the sanction.
a)      To make any additions to a building or to make alterations or repairs involving the removal or re-erecting of any partition or wall, supporting the roof or exceeding ½ of the plinth level.
b)      To make any alteration in any room(s) involving the subdivision of any room or their conversion; or the repairing, removal or construction on a street close to the building; closing or opening or any window or door and the removal of staircase(s).
In order to do such work the application must contain the documents having the plan to be executed.
2.1.  Sanitation and Public Health
Chapter XV deals with the obligation of the Municipal Committee/ Corporation in relation to the following matters:
a)      Daily cleansing of streets of rubbish and filth (S-261).
b)      Placement of depots, containers, holders and places for rubbish, garbage and other polluted matter (S-262).
c)      Removal of garbage and other wastage by collected or gathered on the premises of factories or workshops (S-265)
d)     The Commissioner may ask the owner or occupier of such premises to collect all such garbage and other polluted matter and transport that by such routes as may be specified. They may also prohibit such occupiers or owners under section 266 to accumulate such rubbish, filth or polluted matter for more than 20 hours. Simultaneously, no owner or occupier should be allowed to throw or run down the waste into the drain or street except in the manner provided(S-266).
e)      Scavenging and cleansing of filthy or unwholesome premises, streets or places(S-267). Commissioner has the power to order for the scavenging and cleansing of such places wherein the occupier fails to do that and may recover the expenses as the arrear of tax. He may order for the construction of public convenience places based on separate compartments as per gender.
Besides, this chapter also provides for the following facilities in relation to the construction of new buildings or houses and works,
a)      Water flush latrines along with urinals on each floor and as per gender (S-269-270)
b)      In case of tenants and separate accommodation for servants, same facilities should be provided(S- 271)
c)      Latrines and urinals for markets and other public places as per the description and number(S-277)
d)     In case of private accommodations, Commissioner may write for the construction and maintenance of the same facilities in case not built already (S-273).
e)       Commissioner may order for the vacation of such premises which are not provided with sufficient accommodation for convenience.
f)       Removal of congested buildings, (S-274) — if MC is satisfied that some buildings or residential houses cause crowdedness and aren’t having proper ventilation or drainage. They may issue an order of removal of such buildings, however, after an inspection by the Corporation Health Officer is made.
g)      Improvement of buildings unfit for human habitation, (Ss-275, 276 and 277). In case upon any information, Commissioner is satisfied that certain area or buildings aren’t suitable for the living purposes, he may order for the repairs or constructions in such buildings. In case, a person possessing such premises fails to do so within a specified period of time, same will be done by the MC, at the cost of the owner. Commissioner may, under Section 277, cause the demolition of such buildings too.
Test for declaring a building unfit for human accommodation, or habitation: It has been laid down Section 277, and states that following matters should be given a due regard for the purposes of fitness-
·         Repair;
·         Stability;
·         Freedom from damp;
·         Natural light and air;
·         Water supply;
·         Drainage and sanitary conveniences;
·         Facilities for storage, preparation and cooking of food and for the disposal of rubbish, filth and other polluted matter; and
·         the building be deemed to be unfit as aforesaid if and only if it is so defective in one or more of the said matters that it is not reasonably suitable for occupation in that condition.
An explanation appended to Section 277 states that “work of improvement” shall be construed to include—
·         Necessary repairs;
·         Structural alterations;
·         Provision of light points and water taps;
·         Construction of drains, open or covered;
·         Provision of latrines and urinals;
·         Provision of additional or improved fixtures and fittings;
·         Opening up or paving of courtyard;
·         Removal of rubbish, filth and others, and
·         Any other work including the demolition of any building or any part thereof which, in the opinion of the Commissioner is necessary for executing any of the works specified above.
 
3.      Powers, Procedure, Offences and Penalties
 a)      Power to entry and inspection: According to sec 357, Commissioner has a power to enter into any building for the purpose of inspection, or may empower any employee:
*        For the purposes of ascertaining any contravention of the provisions in connection to any building or land.
*        For the purposes of ascertaining any contravention of the provisions in connection to any building or land.
*        For the purpose of ascertaining the circumstances to authorize any action.
*        For the purpose of executing any work or to make any examination measurement, valuation and survey.
*        For the purposes of inspecting any land, adjacent to the land of work under section 358 to authorize the owner for necessary amendments.
b)      Similarly Commissioner has the power to enter a land adjacent to land in relation to work and can order amendments like building a wall etc. In doing so minimum damage should be done and it should be compensated.
c)      In case of any emergency, according to Sec-359, Municipal Commissioner may consider a case for breaking into a building by breaking the tools of input. However, minimum damage should be sustained and entry must be made in presence of two witnesses and a report should be made in this regard.
The entry to the house must be made in the daytime between sunrise and sunset (S-360). However, under S-361, Commissioner is duty-bound to seek the consent of entering into the premises and a notice of twenty-four hours must be given to seeking the consent. According to the proviso of this section, no such consent would be required in case there is an apprehension that there is an animal is slaughtered in any shed, latrine, and urinal or in any under-construction building. Sec- 362, due regard has to be given to the social or religious places or the buildings having the female occupancy
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Municipal Authorities under the Corporation

 

1. Appointment of Commissioner: According to Section 45, Chapter IV of the MCA, 2000 government is authorised to appoint any officer of class I category as a Commissioner of Corporation. He should be appointed for a tenure of 15 years but should have a 3 years term at the very outset. It further states that government may require his appearance in some special meetings, however, for that purpose a resolution needs to be passed first.

2. Functions of the Commissioner: Per provisions of chapter IV, Section 50, a commissioner shall discharge the functions under this Act as well as of the others too. He must—

·         Exercise all the powers and discharge all the duties specially conferred or imposed by this Act or by any other law for the time being in force;

·         Prescribe the duties of and exercise supervision and control over Corporation officers and other Corporation employees.

·         He should dispose of all questions relating to the service of the said officers and other employees and their pay, privileges, allowances and other conditions of service;

·         On the occurrence of an accident, unforeseen event or natural calamity involving or likely to involve extensive damages to any property of the Corporation or danger to human life— take immediate action in consultation with the Mayor.

·         Bring to the notice of the Corporation any act or resolution of the Corporation which may be in violation of any Government instructions or the provisions of this Act. If he fails to do so, he’ll be subject to violation and omission. 

 

[1] Section 41 (1)
[2] Section 41 (2)

x

Tuesday, 28 April 2020

‘Media trial’ as an Impediment to ‘Fair Trial’

Also published in http://www.risingkashmir.com/news/media-trial-as-an-impediment-to-fair-trail-360402.html

In the year 2015, American director Tom McCarthy’s film— ‘Spotlight’, received a global acclaim. In his film, he has skilfully illustrated— the enormity of ‘investigative journalism’. No matter, how hard, or imperceptible… Truth at the end, serves the public. Besides, its depiction of a brilliant anecdote. There are a few façades, which shall not go unnoticed.
a. Corporate media houses can go to any magnitude, to keep up their interest.
b. An aberration can reduce journalism to mere profiteering.

The rationale to touch-on this film is palpable. That’s the significance of media. With the help of technology, it has pull off a great boost. From reporting of a crime scene, to bring forth the societal outrage. Everything is being thrashed out on the ‘prime time’. More ghastly a crime, more passionately it is aired. The identity— of both— accused and victim, is sacrificed to a ‘breaking news’. Neither investigation, nor the evidence is scrutinized. Some random ‘anchor’, under an intense presentation shouts out his verdict. Of guilt, and innocence. Of conviction, and acquittal.
In this way— an open media trial, reaches to an end. In so doing ‘whether he cares more’? Answer is in negative. Because, he does that for a meagre TRP. And, unfortunately such ‘studio fantasy’ has gone rogue in the 21st century.

Now the question is, how far does this ‘theatre bashing’ help in evaluating the real guilt? How’re we influenced by it? How does a Judge, or an Investigating Officer receive it? Whether it causes any prejudice to a trial? Let’s explore.

A Circuit Judge, in America, in the year 1984 would schedule the proceedings of a criminal trial, at night. In order to justify his act. The respected Judge cited the telecast of a late night show, entailing a story identical to the trial. In order to prevent the Jurors from its influence. He would start the proceedings at the very show timing. Another American Judge, Joseph Tauro, wrote in 1969— none craves to shackle the press, through the contempt of court. We must but, admit the possibility of an unfair trial.

The strong public emotion triggered by press, cannot be relegated. In his apt words, Justice HR Khanna states, to ensure fair trial, court is compelled to guard itself against the ‘pre-trial publicity’ of a case. If it couldn’t, the inevitable effect is certain.

It is true that a Judge possesses a distinguished cognition. He’s duty-bound to adduce material on record. Nothing more, or less. However, if we go by the studies. Jurists in India, seem(s) to be believing that ‘Judges may get influenced, though not consciously, but subconsciously’.

In comparison to a formal trial, the concept ‘media trial’ is a mockery. In fact, it can be termed as absurd and vague. Courts, and only courts are empowered to conduct the trial. That however, doesn’t mean informal media trials don’t create a difference.

In his address to Judicial Officers, in 2017 at SKICC, Justice G. Raghuram referred to the study of ‘Neuroscientists’ about ‘Audio Visual Effects’ on human brain. He warned Judges against the captivity of ‘what’s being presented on TVs’. He said, “A person becomes captive, and starts believing it. It is the intuitive part of the brain, which gets prejudiced the most”. In the same conference, former CJ of India Deepak Mishra mentioned that ‘the pre-trial publicity’ of sub-judice matters has become an endangering trend. In its short term TRP objective, it has a tendency to develop bias in the Judicial Officers.

A free press is an utmost necessity. But, stretching it unnecessarily is perilous. The ‘proof beyond reasonable doubt’, and ‘innocent until proven guilty’; these are the basic doctrines of our ‘Criminal Justice Jurisprudence’. Without realising this line of difference, the noisy media trails— use parties of a case as ‘bait’ for their ‘intense journalism’. Instead of allowing courts to conduct a fair trial, they sell absurdity. Apart from suffering from the scar of crime, victims of crime, have to bear the brunt of media too.

To put an end to this smear campaigning by media, a former CJ, JS Khehar, in 2017 stated— even if an accused is acquitted. His reputation stands injured by the ruthless sell out of electronic media. Time has come to draw a line of difference, between what can be ‘fair and free’. In the year 2010, Supreme Court reiterated, informative media is a necessity. But presaged the trial by media. For, it is very antithesis to the ‘rule of law’, and can well lead to a ‘miscarriage of justice’.

The Law Commission of India, in its 200th report produced an extensive research on this subject. Commission warned the government on the ‘transgression of media’. Besides, it proposed a multipronged amendment. Firstly— The High Courts shall be empowered to prohibit the ‘pre-trail publications’, wherever necessary. Second— Such publications shall be considered from the ‘period of arrest’, instead of ‘filing of charge sheet’. Thirdly— the journalists must be trained in certain aspects of evidence law. Their curriculum, at school level, must include human rights, constitutional law, and the law on defamation. But, fifteen years, down the line of these substantive recommendations, nothing such has taken place. The Commission also had suggested, ‘freedom of press’ in terms of Article 19(1) (a) has become ‘a threat’ to judiciary. To avert that, a balance must be set, before it’ll crumble the whole institution.

In this intricate universe, we have come too far. What used be a news-only rendering body, has metamorphosed into a complex body. Media used to be an impartial, independent and reliable institution. It has now lost its balance. What should have been a ‘spotlight’, has become mere noise. From airing of doctored items, fake news to usurping of political ideologies. It has lost its entirety to communalism, and propaganda. Owing to which, it has grown more dreadful. A speaker once said, “The way TV anchors are shouting in news and debates. It seems they share the ‘ultimate mandamus’, of whatever is happening’’.

A judge takes years to reach to a verdict. But, an analyst on TV does that in an episode of ‘news hour’. Having said this. I think— time has come. When so called ‘media trails’ should be put to an end, forever. If not prohibited, or diluted, it’ll definitely result in adversity to courts. At least, the reporters shall be imparted a familiarity of ‘what shall be reported and what not’. So that a balance is drawn between, ‘free press and fair trial’. For, the whole gamut is of ‘faith of people’. Once media succeeds in attenuating that. Courts will turn into the museums…


Wednesday, 5 February 2020

Pain in The Neck


Oh! The murky-depressing nights,
creepy stillness, and,
the miserably rambling voices.
Be the witness,
of my weary patience;
the acute pulse
to the uneasy-calmness.
Remind me of these epochs,
the disquiet voices,
buzzing in my skin;
hissing and boos.
Afar horizons, when I laugh,
or, fly too-high.
Evocate, my teary eyes,
the drizzle of reflections,
and the sleepless nights.
Behold my bellyaches,
for the pleasing mornings,
and shining of the sun.
In fondling of melancholy,
make me to remember—
ecstasy is on its way.
Beneath that,
Every twinge shall decay.
And, pain in the neck,
shall go away...

Paradoxical Sentencing and Crime Against Women

http://risingkashmir.com/news/paradoxical-sentencing-and-crime-against-women-356558.html


In the year 2012, shocking ‘gang rape and murder’ of a girl takes place in Delhi. The incident sends chills down the spine of civil society. Protests, debates, discussions and censures take place. Eventually, a Criminal Amendment Act, 2013 is legislated, providing more stringent punishment for the crimes against women. Yet, in 2017, the ‘Unnao gang rape’ transpires. The perp is a ruling party politician. In 2018, another episode of similar nature happens. This time in J&K, and the victim being a minor. Hate, anguish and the rage— is what instantly explodes. Again the criminal law is intensified to inhibit the iterations. Twixt this, other instances of alike nature, keep on adding to the unfortunate list. Thereby, making us to think— what’re we off to? Have we reached a phase, where ‘deterrence and retribution’ fail in the entirety? Or, to ensure the safety over empathy, an uncommon bridge should be build.

Hitherto, the 19th century jurists had a ubiquitous belief to hate the crime, but not a criminal. ‘He’s a sick, and needs a treatment’, said psychiatrists. The only viable tool is ‘reformation and rehabilitation’. But, then ‘Retributivists’ believe(d) ‘a convicted felon deserves penalty for the harm he has caused’. And, unlike ‘Deterrents’ none of the schools believe on the ‘preventive functionality’ of punishment. Thus, in the middle of this jurisprudential skirmish, who shall we pin our hopes to? Before, deciding that let’s first have an extra dig.

World over, and in India— ‘deterrence’ is a substance of sentencing. How far has it triumphed? How much effective it has been in controlling the crime? Whether taking the life of a convict is really an answer? These are some preliminary questions, which arise, every time some (horrific) crime takes place.

In the year, 2011, there were 2,28,650 reported incidents of crime against women, in India. Owing to the more deterrence oriented criminal law, such crime rate should have dipped in the prospective years. NCRB, however, in 2015 records over 3,00,000 cases. Subsequently, the data for the year 2017, published on Oct 28th, 2019 records over 3,59,849 cases. That’s an increase of around 57%. As compared to 2016, there was an increase of 6% in the year 2017. A decade before, in 2009, the number was just 2,03, 804.

Previously Delhi; now it’s Utter Pradesh (56011 cases) topping the list. Having 31979/30002 documented incidents, Maharashtra and West Bengal, fall second. Though least, J&K by 1%, makes a contribution, too. Thereby, making India the most unsafe place for the women.

The rationale is to underscore the relevance of sentencing scheme. Criminal justice in India is applying a peculiar approach. Neither fully laced with deterrence. Nor purely reformative. Which makes it vulnerable. Had it been effective— we shouldn’t have witnessed the adversity.

Put simply. If numbers speak. The model of deterrence— private or general— hasn’t been successful. It will be so, if applied with ingenuity. Awarding death to one in a quarter million rape convicts won’t suffice. Let’s not create a paradox of reformation, and retribution. Make every perpetrator an example, or just focus on the correctional-only aspects. A simultaneous rub on both, has yielded, but a despicable crime rate.

Prosecution hunts down the beast of a rape victim. True it is. But, has it ever restored her dignity. Answer is no.

The ‘prevention of crime’ should be a focal point; then its aftermath. In so doing, morality can be helpful besides the law. The principles of morality may be related; not the objectivity. If we live by jurists, ‘morality and law are supplementary and complementary’. One might not violate the law every time he violates morality, but vice-versa does produce a tiff. Ethics, and imparting of ecclesiastical code has a great gratitude to our society. Although, prone to the tremors of exposition. It’s rich in cultural ethos.

There’s no dearth of legal framework. Deficiency, however, lies in its draft work. Sentencing has a philosophy. Either we can rehabilitate a criminal. Or, we have to deter him. A rape victim dies on the bestiality of rape. Weigh such convicts indiscriminately. Else, decades later— criminal law would be still— in the commotions of ‘deterrent reformation’.
(Author is Research Associate with Legal Aid Clinic, School of Legal Studies—CUK. Feedback: mashooq.law@gmail.com)

Highlights

The Chaos Unexpressed!

You have been, if not today, but at certain point of time pushed by your thoughts to the brink of isolation despite the companionship you ha...